Talk:Bottom bondage
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)

(Comment) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I was amused to see this argument. It's a perfectly natural thing to do as part of a complex rope tie.--[[User:Leafman|Leafman]] 10:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | I was amused to see this argument. It's a perfectly natural thing to do as part of a complex rope tie.--[[User:Leafman|Leafman]] 10:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | : This is an example of [[Ugol's Law]]: "For any given kink, either nobody does it or more than one person does it".--[[User:Catsuit|Catsuit]] ([[User talk:Catsuit|talk]]) 21:51, 26 September 2013 (BST) |
Latest revision as of 16:51, 26 September 2013
Surely this is not a serious bondage technique! It sounds more like the basis of a comedy sketch in Little Britain :-) Balzac 18:42, 4 June 2006 (BST)
- It's not a bondage technique in the sense of a way of immobilising someone; it's just a bit of fun. I like it, anyway! --Taxwoman 22:31, 4 June 2006 (BST)
I was amused to see this argument. It's a perfectly natural thing to do as part of a complex rope tie.--Leafman 10:16, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- This is an example of Ugol's Law: "For any given kink, either nobody does it or more than one person does it".--Catsuit (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2013 (BST)