Talk:Lingerie
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
(I'd doubt that anything else is worth its own article) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Not really, I just had not got around to doing any more editing [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 07:43, 28 March 2007 (BST) | Not really, I just had not got around to doing any more editing [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 07:43, 28 March 2007 (BST) | ||
+ | :We've already got an article on [[stocking fetishism]], which arguably covers stockings and suspenders. I'd doubt that anything else is worth its own article.--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 22:31, 29 March 2007 (BST) |
Revision as of 17:31, 29 March 2007
Do we really intend to have future articles on all the types of lingerie now shown as red links? AnonMoos 17:18, 27 March 2007 (BST)
Not really, I just had not got around to doing any more editing Balzac 07:43, 28 March 2007 (BST)
- We've already got an article on stocking fetishism, which arguably covers stockings and suspenders. I'd doubt that anything else is worth its own article.--Taxwoman 22:31, 29 March 2007 (BST)