Talk:Bride fetish
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
m (Formatting) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
<br clear="all"/> | <br clear="all"/> | ||
No reason not to have all three in a gallery; they aren't huge.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 14:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC) | No reason not to have all three in a gallery; they aren't huge.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 14:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :There are some others on a semi-similar theme by [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Alfred_Cheney_Johnston Alfred Cheney Johnston], but they could probably only be used if the specific photos were known to be published in the U.S. before 1923... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] 12:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:13, 29 March 2011
Thanks for making a start. I have some images which would explain much more directly why this can be relevant to BDSM, but they're not available under a free license, so I can't upload them here... AnonMoos 01:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Image "grovel138.jpg" on page [1] would be one particular example, but that probably has dodgy copyright status... AnonMoos 09:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Here are some which are OK for copyright: AnonMoos 18:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Came across a third image in the "Corona 119" series; we shouldn't necessarily put all three on the article, but I've put it here so it can be compared... AnonMoos 08:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
No reason not to have all three in a gallery; they aren't huge.--Ropeuser 14:16, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- There are some others on a semi-similar theme by Alfred Cheney Johnston, but they could probably only be used if the specific photos were known to be published in the U.S. before 1923... AnonMoos 12:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
