Talk:Capitalisation
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
(Query) |
Interesdom (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Surely in S&M it is the masochism that expresses sub status, not sadism. So why isn't it S&m?--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 23:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | Surely in S&M it is the masochism that expresses sub status, not sadism. So why isn't it S&m?--[[User:Taxwoman|Taxwoman]] 23:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :lol - very good point. The impetus for writing this topic came from reading Paige's entry on [[Slave - Personal Experiences]] and I didn't pick up on your point. Perhaps Paige thinks that S&M stands for 'slave and master', hence her capitalisation of 's&M'. I've fixed the article, using D/s, but still don't think it's up to me to change her personal entry. --[[User:Interesdom|Interesdom]] 12:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:40, 3 January 2008
Surely in S&M it is the masochism that expresses sub status, not sadism. So why isn't it S&m?--Taxwoman 23:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- lol - very good point. The impetus for writing this topic came from reading Paige's entry on Slave - Personal Experiences and I didn't pick up on your point. Perhaps Paige thinks that S&M stands for 'slave and master', hence her capitalisation of 's&M'. I've fixed the article, using D/s, but still don't think it's up to me to change her personal entry. --Interesdom 12:40, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
