Talk:Hotpants
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Given how little text there is, do we really need two photos of hot pants? I think it unbalences the article and given that this is a fetish wipi the second photo is not very kinky! ~~~~) |
(I did think it was a very cute photo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Given how little text there is, do we really need two photos of hot pants? I think it unbalences the article and given that this is a fetish wipi the second photo is not very kinky! [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | Given how little text there is, do we really need two photos of hot pants? I think it unbalences the article and given that this is a fetish wipi the second photo is not very kinky! [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | : I did think it was a very cute photo, but as always I'm happy to defer to others. [[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 08:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:44, 9 January 2009
Given how little text there is, do we really need two photos of hot pants? I think it unbalences the article and given that this is a fetish wipi the second photo is not very kinky! Balzac 21:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- I did think it was a very cute photo, but as always I'm happy to defer to others. Ropeuser 08:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
