Talk:Polo neck
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Not really a fetish article, wpuld it not be better to link directly to the wikipedia article which is much more complete and encylopedic? ~~~~) |
(Reply to Balzac) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not really a fetish article, wpuld it not be better to link directly to the wikipedia article which is much more complete and encylopedic? [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 08:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | Not really a fetish article, wpuld it not be better to link directly to the wikipedia article which is much more complete and encylopedic? [[User:Balzac|Balzac]] 08:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | : I don't see the Wikipedia article as concentrating on the fetish side. The article is an adjunct to articles about catsuits, leotards, etc.; it would be repetitious to have this material in each of those articles. [[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 11:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:12, 14 November 2009
Not really a fetish article, wpuld it not be better to link directly to the wikipedia article which is much more complete and encylopedic? Balzac 08:36, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see the Wikipedia article as concentrating on the fetish side. The article is an adjunct to articles about catsuits, leotards, etc.; it would be repetitious to have this material in each of those articles. Ropeuser 11:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
