Talk:Vulva
From wipipedia.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | From the wikipedia | + | From the wikipedia ''-- 19:11, 30 March 2005 Balzac'' |
| + | |||
| + | ==Blank artistic depictions== | ||
| + | It was a reality of life in Victorian England (especially in the English-speaking countries) that images of fully naked women could only be displayed in public view under several fairly strict conditions, such as that the subject matter must depict a mythological, allegorical, remote historical, or exotic (pseudo-"oriental") theme, and also that no pubic hair could be shown. Displays which violated these conditions were considered highly inappropriate for children, women, and youths, and if too publicly prominent could attract negative attention or incur government action... [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 17:05, 22 September 2012 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 12:05, 22 September 2012
From the wikipedia -- 19:11, 30 March 2005 Balzac
Blank artistic depictions
It was a reality of life in Victorian England (especially in the English-speaking countries) that images of fully naked women could only be displayed in public view under several fairly strict conditions, such as that the subject matter must depict a mythological, allegorical, remote historical, or exotic (pseudo-"oriental") theme, and also that no pubic hair could be shown. Displays which violated these conditions were considered highly inappropriate for children, women, and youths, and if too publicly prominent could attract negative attention or incur government action... AnonMoos (talk) 17:05, 22 September 2012 (BST)
