User talk:Jahc

Revision as of 08:47, 27 May 2013

Please don't get yourself in a tiff because nothing happens for 24 hours after you point out a problem -- this is a low-volume wiki, and sometimes several days can go by without any edits at all. AnonMoos (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2013 (BST)

Please explain why we should go out of our way to indulge your whims, given your attitude. I'm sorry someone uploaded the snorkel image without permission several years ago (an image that was not too great anyway, in my opinion, and didn't add too much to this site), but it's pointless to ascribe collective guilt... AnonMoos (talk) 21:29, 26 May 2013 (BST)

Do not patronise me, whoever you think you are. You are bothered by my attitude? Are you serious?

Try answering the question, eh?

REMOVE MY COPYRIGHT WORK FROM HERE: http://www.fetbook.it/wiki/index.php?title=File:Underwater_bondage.jpg#filelinks

If you are unable to do that, just say so, and I will take legal action against the hosts directly.

And remove my other image, the spread hogtie one, now.

I allowed you to use that image in good faith.

But your site hosted other stuff of mine illegally, under a bogus commons licence, and has caused me hours and hours of deeply frustrating work, which is a total waste of my time and seriously annoying.

Your dismissive and snotty attitude, instead of understanding how much hassle this has caused, is very disappointing. To put it mildly.

So I revoke permission to use any of my work, and you will remove it immediately.

I do hope that is clear.

I add my apologies to those of AnonMoos. However, I am afraid that neither AnonMoos nor I has any ability to do anything on Fetbook; you would have to contact the site operator there. I would also point out that hosting the image was in no way illegal; copyright violation is not a criminal offence.--Ropeuser (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2013 (BST)

@ Ropeuser - thank you for actually answering the question. Wasn't so hard now, was it?

You should not have passed on permission to publish my, or anyone else's material to another site, though, without expressed consent. Wiki commons, on the other hand, have been very good. Even google and tumblr and pininterest responded very quickly and took down all copies of my work they or I could identify without any fuss. You, though, seem to have a deeply unprofessional approach to these things. You know, an apology for allowing an anonymous user to upload my copyright material and claim a commons licence for it, without you guys even checking it, would not go amiss.

And I first took legal action over copyright violations in 1986 - and I have never lost a case. So, please don't bother with the patronising crap about what is and what is not illegal.