User talk:Star651
(→"BDSM theme") |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The article about Cannibalism didn't sound sexual at all. This article has something to do with a sexual website, right? [[User:Star651|Star651]] 02:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | The article about Cannibalism didn't sound sexual at all. This article has something to do with a sexual website, right? [[User:Star651|Star651]] 02:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
: I'm not sure that you've grasped what AnonMoos is saying. This is a fetish and BDSM encyclopedia. It is not about sex in general, but alternative sexuality. As such, run of the mill pornography is out of scope.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 07:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | : I'm not sure that you've grasped what AnonMoos is saying. This is a fetish and BDSM encyclopedia. It is not about sex in general, but alternative sexuality. As such, run of the mill pornography is out of scope.--[[User:Ropeuser|Ropeuser]] 07:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think this website is more general-sex than SM-201; SM-201 is 100% alternative. The reason I say this? There is already [[Playboy]] in Wipi, let alone common-place sex terms such as [[penis]], [[orgasm]], [[impotence]] and possibly [[erection]]. If [[Playboy]] is okay, why not RedTube? If there were no articles like the one I mentioned, I'd definitely stick to fetish-themed articles. [[User:Star651|Star651]] 17:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 8 April 2012
Welcome to Wipipedia; we hope you enjoy this site. Thanks for your contributions. Please feel free to create or edit further pages; we always welcome fresh material and viewpoints. We do prefer British spelling here, but don't worry, spelling will be corrected. If you need any help, please e-mail me or leave a note on my talk page.--Ropeuser 18:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
educational vs. informational
The word "educational" has some distractingly inappropriate or irrelevant connotations, so it's unfortunate that you place such great emphasis on it. "Informative"/"Information" would be better... AnonMoos 11:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
"BDSM theme"
Don't want to be too much of a nitpicker, but it seems a little odd that after you complained that an article lacked enough of a "BDSM theme", your next edit was to create an article without any "BDSM theme"... AnonMoos 16:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
The article about Cannibalism didn't sound sexual at all. This article has something to do with a sexual website, right? Star651 02:12, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that you've grasped what AnonMoos is saying. This is a fetish and BDSM encyclopedia. It is not about sex in general, but alternative sexuality. As such, run of the mill pornography is out of scope.--Ropeuser 07:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I think this website is more general-sex than SM-201; SM-201 is 100% alternative. The reason I say this? There is already Playboy in Wipi, let alone common-place sex terms such as penis, orgasm, impotence and possibly erection. If Playboy is okay, why not RedTube? If there were no articles like the one I mentioned, I'd definitely stick to fetish-themed articles. Star651 17:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
